Why this matters now

As return-to-office (RTO) mandates gain traction worldwide, leaders in emerging markets face a paradox. The push for physical presence collides head-on with brutal urban traffic, evolving workforce expectations, and rapidly maturing legal frameworks for remote work. In markets like the Philippines and Colombia – both vital players in the global services economy – how companies navigate this tension will define their competitiveness, talent retention, and operational sustainability.

The Commute as Corporate Risk: Realities from Manila to Bogota

Let’s start with the facts: Metro Manila ranks among the world’s most congested cities, with average speeds at a crawl. Workers routinely lose 2 – 3 hours a day just getting to and from the office. In Bogotá, the INRIX Global Traffic Scorecard shows over 122 hours lost annually per driver. These aren’t just personal inconveniences – they’re structural liabilities.

For BPOs, tech firms, and professional services providers, this level of friction erodes productivity, spikes attrition, and worsens employee health. In both countries, employee resistance to RTO has grown – not from rebellion, but from rational fatigue.

Remote Work is Not Just a Perk – It’s a Baseline Expectation

In the Philippines, over 70% of workers would switch jobs for permanent remote work, per JobStreet’s 2024 survey. In Colombia, the number of remote workers has surged 12-fold since 2019. Yet the organizational response remains fragmented.

Some employers, like Globe Telecom, Accenture Philippines and here at Filta, have embraced structured flexibility. Others, especially those operating in government-regulated export zones, still enforce rigid RTO – citing compliance pressures that employees increasingly push back on.

Colombian firms are trending toward hybrid-by-default. Tech-forward companies are building distributed models that align not only with policy but with performance outcomes.

The Legal Layer: Flexibility Enabled – But Not Always Enforced

In the Philippines, the Telecommuting Act of 2018 (RA 11165) supports remote work through mutual agreements and parity in benefits. Its intent – to reduce traffic and improve work-life balance – is progressive and still open to interpretation. Colombia, by contrast, offers two complementary laws: Law 2121 enables full remote roles with digital disconnection rights, while Law 1221 regulates hybrid arrangements with clear employer obligations. This dual framework provides clarity and protection, enabling smoother adoption and fewer grey zones.

What Smart Employers Are Doing Differently

In both markets, the leading edge is not defined by tech adoption, but by policy integration. Here’s what forward-looking companies are doing:

• Treating traffic as a workforce risk, not just an infrastructure issue.
• Using national telework laws as strategic frameworks, not compliance hurdles.
• Building hybrid models that balance cultural norms (like trust through in-person rapport) with operational flexibility.
• Rethinking real estate through coworking hubs or satellite offices closer to talent.

Productivity data supports them: when properly structured, hybrid work enhances output, improves morale, and lowers attrition.

The Cultural Catch: Why Hybrid, Not Just Remote, might be a Sweet Spot

Both Filipino and Colombian cultures value face time – not as micromanagement, but as trust-building. As Erin Meyer notes in The Culture Map, these are “relationship-based” cultures. In-person interactions still carry weight for alignment, feedback, and team cohesion.

This means fully remote models may miss the mark culturally, even if they’re technically efficient. The best-performing employers aren’t choosing remote or in-office – they’re designing their own hybrid systems that build trust in-person, then deliver results remotely.

The Takeaway: Align Policy, Culture, and Commuting Reality

What we’re seeing in the Philippines and Colombia is not just a logistical challenge – it’s a strategic turning point. The future of work here depends on more than infrastructure or employee preference. It hinges on whether employers can reconcile legal frameworks, cultural dynamics, and lived urban realities into one coherent talent strategy.

For global companies operating in these markets, the message is clear: Adapt your RTO model – or risk falling behind in talent, trust, and throughput.

If you’re rethinking how to align your workforce model with these realities, Filta has been helping global teams design hybrid strategies grounded in compliance, culture, and commercial value. 

Let’s talk about what that could look like for you.

Love insights like these?

Join Outsourcing Un-Filta’d – The Global Growth Newsletter by Filta Co-Founder & Chief Growth Officer, Nerissa Chaux.

Be the first to access exclusive global hiring intel and cultural insights built for leaders growing global teams.

Sign up here: https://bit.ly/TheGlobalGrowthNewsletter 

Explore more of these insights at filtaglobal.com 
Connect to Nerissa Chaux via LinkedIn!